![]() |
easy to interpret and may belong to extinct phyla. But besides the fossils of soft bodies, Vendian rocks contain trace fossils, probably made by wormlike animals slithering over mud. The Vendian rocks thus give us a good look at the first animals to live on Earth. The Ediacaran hey-day predates by a distinct interval of perhaps 20 million years or more, the so-called "Cambrian Explosion". Although some scientists believe that many of these Ediacara fauna might have survived into the Cambrian period, they had vanished without a trace from later fossil records. Other scientists have suggested that the Ediacaran fauna were "failed experiments" in the evolution of multicellular animals. Unlike the Cambrian organisms, these odd designs left no descendants. A novel explanation suggests that the Ediacaran fossils weren't animals at all. Rather, they were probably lichens. Whatever the interpretation, it seems that the appearance of the Ediacaran fauna and the Cambrian biota are two separate events, and both flourished suddenly in a "complete state". |
Figure 01a Ediacara Fauna [view large image] |
![]() |
For much of the past 20 years the debate has been polarized between those who believe that the Ediacarans were a dead-end experiment in evolution and those who maintain that the Ediacarans are the "long fuse" of the Cambrian explosion. As more fossils were discovered in Newfoundland, ... (Avalon assemblage - the oldest), the White Sea region of Russia (White Sea assemblage including those from Ediacara Hills, ...), and Namibia, ... (Nama assemblage), it turns out that both camps are, to some extent, right. As shown in Figure 01b, the Avalon assemblage consists of primitive type of animal living in deep sea with fungus-like traits that left no descendants. The other group from the White Sea and Nama assemblages lived in shallow-water. One of these, Parvancorina, bears a close resemblance to a recently discovered early Cambrian arthropod. Another, Arkarua, looks a lot like a Cambrian echinoderm. It is now thought that a handful of Ediacarans did cross over into the early Cambrian. The overwhelming majority did not make it, though; the few that did vanished within 5 million years. The first experiment in complex, multicellular life was over. But it laid the foundation for everything that followed. It is suggested that the sudden precambrian boom was triggered by massive |
Figure 01b Ediacarans |
increase in deep-sea oxygen levels, and plenty of organic matter from the melting glaciers. The experimental method was to create large body from small units through fractal repetition. |
![]() |
Recent measurement of oxygen level over the past 600 million years suggests that oxygen may be the driving force for evolution. Figure 01c shows that periods of lower oxygen level have coincided with all the major mass extinctions, whereas land colonisation occurred with rising levels. The importance of oxygen can be illustrated by the lack of it. It is well known that animals need to feed, drink, reproduce and respire. The first three requirements can usually be put off for days or even years, but for the vast majority of animals respiration can be put off only for a few minutes. Evolution is prodded by natural selection, which is an euphemism for variable rates of death. And nothing kills quicker than lack of oxygen. |
Figure 01c Oxygen Level |
![]() |
|
Figure 01d Cambrian Period [view large image] |
still survive today. They are the lampreys and hagfish. |
![]() |
They include virtually all the groups known from the Burgess Shale and other Middle Cambrian localities, thus compressing the available time for the morphological diversification of metazoans, known as the Cambrian Explosion, to just 10 Million years or so. These extraordinary fossil deposits, where organisms are so well preserved that even their soft parts remain as carbon films, are referred to as Lagerstätten, a German word that means "resting places", only recently borrowed by geologists. A lagerstatte is a spectacular rarity, and a few dozen of them are scattered through the Earth's geologic record like gems. |
Figure 01e Chengjiang Fossils [view large image] |
![]() |
warned against too exclusive a reliance on natural selection. Close examination of the history of life shows that the change is not necessarily progressive; it is certainly not predictable. The earth's creatures have evolved through a series of contingent and fortuitous events such as the Cambrian explosion and the mass extinctions, which imparts a quirky and unpredictable character to life's evolutionary pathway. There is still much controversy over the significance of the Burgess and Chengjiang fossils. What is certain is that the transformation of life from single-celled organisms to multicellular organisms was swift, sudden and widespread. Another significant point is that if evolution was occurring at such a rapid rate, why are the Chengjiang fossils and the Burgess fossils so similar? During the 20 million year period between the two sites, evolution seems to have produced very little change. It seems that all of the diversity that was going to occur happened in a time period as short as 10 million years. Hardly an observation that supports a Darwinian view that life evolved by the slow accumulation of fortuitous mutations. Thus, there is suggestion that complex life came to earth (in the early Cambrian and probably Vendian) from elsewhere with many if not all of the biochemical processes in place. A possible fault with this kind of argument is the strong DNA linkage between the unicellular and mulitcellular organisms. It is highly improbable that the DNA structures of these organims are so closely related if the seed for multicellular organisms has another place of origin. |
Figure 01f Natural Selection |
![]() |
Research in 2004 attributed the complexity of multicellular organism to the use of RNA based regulatory signals. The Cambrian explosion was related to the abrupt addition of this genetic regulatory system. Figure 01g shows the complexity of eubacteria and archaea at low levels over the past billion years up to the present. While the complexity in eukeayote organisms advanced graudully up to a ceiling and then |
Figure 01g Evolution of Complexity |
increased abruptly at the Cambrian explosion when a new regulatory system became available. (click here for detail). The proliferation of complex life forms some 20 million years prior to the Cambrian explosion might be just the initial trials to become multicellular. |
![]() |
|
Figure 02 Ordovician Period [view large image] |
![]() |
|
Figure 03 Silurian Period [view large image] |
![]() |
|
Figure 04a Devonian Fish |
to tuna, and the lobefins. The ray-fins of the Devonian include cheirolepis, a fast-swimming predator with advanced jaw apparatus to swallow prey up to two-thirds of its own size. Lobe-finned fish is characterized by fins with fleshy bases, or lobes, |
![]() |
containing a jointed series of bones. It is from fish in this assemblage that the first tetrapods, the amphibians, developed. Holoptychius is one example, dipterus (a primitive lungfish) is another one that can breathe air. Figure 04a shows some of the fossilized Devonian fish from Yunnan, China. The one on upper left is the Youngolepis - a specimen in between the lobe-finned fish and the lungfish. Figure 04b summarizes the evolution of fish in a sequence from the jawless fish in the Cambrian, to the primitive jawed fish with amour |
Figure 04b Evolution of Fish |
in the Silurian, and finally advanced to bony fish in the Devonian. |
![]() |
|
Figure 04c Devonian Shark |
![]() |
![]() |
A 365-million-year-old arm bone fossil was found in 2004 (see Figure 04d). It came from one of the first creatures able to do push-ups, an evolutionary step that was necessary for animals to move from the sea to dry land. This four-legged creature had a humerus, or upper arm bone. Such a bone, far different from the flipper bones of fish, gave the creature an important new ability - it could raise its upper body like an athlete doing push-ups. The defining moment has been captured by the drawing in Figure 04e. These are lobe-finned fish called Eusthenopterons, which were more than a fish but |
Figure 04d Fossil [view large image] |
Figure 04e First Land Animal |
less than a true amphibian. They are supposed to be the first creature that crawled onto land about 380 million years ago. |
![]() |
A popular scenario suggests that fish like Eusthenopteron, stranded under arid conditions, used their muscular appendages to drag themselves to a new body of water. Over time those fish able to cover more ground - and thus reach ever more distant water sources - were selected for, eventually leading to the origin of true limbs. Recent research in 2005 on the fossil of Acanthostega indicates that although this animal had four legs, they would not have been able to support its body on land. It seems that they may have initially functioned to help the animal in lifting its head out of oxygen-poor shallow water instead of moving on land. Only later did they find use ashore. Figure 04f shows the transformation of body structure from lobe-finned fish to modern reptile. |
Figure 04f Tetrapod Trans-formation [view large image] |
![]() |
![]() |
reduction in size of the postparietal bones (green) and gradual reshaping of the skull. It also shows the pectoral, and distal fins gradually transformed into forelimbs and digits. A peculiarity of Tiktaalik is its poorly ossified vertebral column that seems to contain an unusually large number of vertebrae. The larger ribs may mean it was better able to support its body out of water. The longer snout suggests a shift from sucking food towards snapping up prey, whereas the loss of the gill cover bones probably |
Figure 04g Tetrapod Transition [view large image] |
Figure 04h Transition of Forelimbs [view large image] |
correlates with reduced water flow through the gill chamber as the animal had become partially living on land. Figure 04h shows the transformation from fins to elbow and wrist-like structures as indicated by the parts in different colors. |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Figure 05a Carboniferous Period [view large image] |
Figure 05b Reptiles |
freedom to lay their eggs on land. Their descendants include all other reptiles, dinosaurs, birds and mammals (Figure 05b). |
![]() |
Hylonomus is the oldest vertebrate recognized as a reptile. Unlike most of the amphibians, these animals were generally not tied to water for reproduction, but laid eggs that were able to survive in a terrestrial environment. Hylonomus had an unbroken expanse of bone behind each eye opening. Other reptiles had one or more gaps, the temporal openings, occupying various positions and enclosed by various bones. Though these patterns vary in details, the gaps themselves - or the lack of them - are the basis for splitting the reptiles into four major groups as shown in Figure 05c. |
Figure 05c Groups of Reptiles |
![]() |
|
Figure 06 Permian Period [view large image] |
![]() |
|
Figure 07a Triassic Period |
coelophysis, which walked and ran on their hind legs, captured prey with fore- limbs and jaws, and balanced their swaying bodies with stiffly extended tails. |
![]() |
shown in Figure 07b. The difference in the orientation of the pubis is related to the feeding habits and stance when walking. All ornithschians were herbivores and many were bipedal. As vegetarians they would have a large gut to allow the food to pass through sufficiently slowly to allow it to be digested, a process involving symbiotic bacteria. Thus, an erect ornithischian would have a "beer Belly", which has to hang between the legs with the pubis pointing backward. The bipedal saurischians were all carnivores so their guts would have been much smaller as meat is quickly digested. |
Figure 07b Pelvic Structures |
![]() |
![]() |
As more mammalian fossils have been unearthed in the past few years, a very different picture of early mammals has emerged to replace the shrew-like description. Dinosaurs may have been the dominant creatures, but mammals were very much a part of their world. They invaded many more ecological niches and developed many more lifestyles than was previously thought possible before the extinction of the dinosaurs. Figure 07c presents a brief guide to early mammal evolution. According to this |
Figure 07c Early Mammal Evolution [view large image] |
Figure 07d Early Mammals [view large image] |
diagram, mammals evolved from a group of "mammals-like" reptiles called cynodonts that prospered during the Triassic period. The larger members of this group went |
![]() |
![]() |
of groups, including small predatory dinosaurs, the early mammals, and some crocodile relatives survived into the Jurassic. Yet large groups of archosaurs mysteriously vanished at the end of the Triassic (Figure 07f). It really isn't obvious why the non-dinosaurs get hammered the most. Anyway, the end-Triassic extinction pruned a number of dinosaurs, but the group as a whole marched on, and prospered in the Jurassic period. |
Figure 07e Extinctions |
Figure 07f Triassic Extinction [view large image] |
![]() |
|
Figure 08a Jurassic Period |
braincase, this crow-sized extinct animal is much more like a small running dinosaur. |
![]() |
It was believed that feathers evolved from scale for flight. New evidence from fossils and recent idea in developmental processes indicate that they evolved for some other purpose and were then exploited for a different use. Numerous functions of feathers are plausible, including insulation, water repellency, court-ship, camouflage and defense. The development of such feature can be traced back to the theropods in the Triassic Period. In essence, all feathers start from a tube produced by proliferating epidermis with the nourishing dermal pulp in |
Figure 08b Feathers [view large image] |
the center. The evolution involved many stages from an unbranched, hollow cylinder (like the pinfeather) to the asymmetrical flight feather (see Figure 08b). |
![]() |
![]() |
The consequence of recent fossil finds has prompted reconsideration of the biology and life history of the theropod dinosaurs. Birds - modern birds and the group that includes all species descnded from the most recent common ancestor of Archaeopteryx - used to be recongnized as the flying, feathered vertebrates. Now we have to consider them as a group of the feathered theropod dinosaurs that evolved the capacity of |
Figure 08c Avian Evolution [view large image] |
Figure 08d Archaeopteryx Traits [view large image] |
powered flight (Figure 08c). Other dinosaurs are very likely to have had feathered skin but were not birds. |
![]() |
Figure 09d shows the characteristics of the Archaeopteryx. It indicates that Archaeopteryx is at the transitional stage between reptile and bird. The size of Archaeopteryx is about 45 cm, and it fed on insects. It has a long bony tail, three-fingered hands with claws, and jaws with teeth. The claws on its feet and hands suggest that Archaeopteryx could climb trees, and the wings are clearly those of an active flying animal. This bird could fly as well as most modern birds, and flying allowed it to catch prey that were not available to land-living relatives. In effect, it had explored a niche in the air. Figure 09e shows the first Archaeopteryx fossil from Bavaria, southern Germany, and an artist's renderings of the very first birds. |
Figure 08e Archaeopteryx and Fossil |
![]() |
suggests that venom evolved in a lizard ancestor before snakes appeared (Figure 08f). Even the supposedly harmless Colubrids such as those sold in pet stores have enough poison in their venom glands to kill a human. Fortunately for the would-be pet owners, they have no front fangs, leaving them with a rather crude venom-delivery system in the back teeth. Snakes such as boas may have lost their venom as they evolved to kill by constriction. It is also found that venom didn't evolve from ever more toxic saliva but from altering cells from other parts of the body including the brain, eye, lung, heart liver, muscle, ovary and testis. Over generations these proteins, usually involved in key biological processes such as blood clotting or regulating blood pressure, were mutated into more potent varieties and concentrated into catastrophic overdoses. The common ancestor had nine such toxins in its venom. Modern snakes have recruited 17 more. |
Figure 08f Snakes [view large image] |
![]() |
Report in 2007 purported to find the missing link between lizards and snakes. The 95 million years old fossil has greatly reduced forelimbs, a diminished supporting skeletal girdle and an elongated neck (see Figure 08g), as seen today in snakes including pythons and boas. But |
Figure 08g Half Snake [view large image] |
researchers still cannot conclude that snakes evolved directly from such lizards without other fossils to fill the evolutionary gaps. |
![]() |
|
Figure 09 Cretaceous Period [view large image] |
![]() |
|
Figure 10a Tertiary Period |
![]() |
|
Figure 10b Maternal Care |
![]() |
|
Figure 10c Circulation Evolution [view large image] |
show the evolution of the double circulation through the heart due to the substitution of lungs for gills in higher vertebrates. In the fish the blood from the gills flowed directly, via the arteries, to the body (systemic capillaries), and hence |
![]() |
|
Figure 10d Brain Evolution [view large image] |
as a group far above any other vertebrate stock in their degree of mental development. |
![]() |
Figure 10e shows the difference between the mammalian and avian brains. It looks similarly shaped but smaller, and it is much less furrowed. Given the well-known dictum that more convolution means higher cognitive function, most scientists have long assumed that birds have limited mental powers. Recent research suggests that the largest part of the avian brain, the pallium (corresponding to the cortex in mammal), works along with structures below it to control complex behaviors (see Figure 10e). Although the nervous systems of the two classes of animals are constructed very differently, they have functional similarities. Many parts of the brain are comparably connected by nerve pathways that have similar functions. For |
Figure 10e Avian Brain |
example, when parrots learn to produce new sounds, the structures activated are analogous to those that are activated in humans. |
![]() |
front of the mouth. In mammals there has developed a bony partition, which separates nasal and food passages back to the throat, a feature of importance in forms in which constant breathing is a vital necessity. In reptiles there are normally some seven bones in the lower jaw; the mammals have but one (the dentary), and this articulates with a different bone on the side of the skull. The whole joint has changed. Figure 10f shows a series of side views of the skull from a lob-finned bony fish A to |
Figure 10f Skull Evolution |
human I. These form a morphologically progressive set of stages representing the various groups through which human ancestors passed. |
![]() |
A (in Figure 10f) is the skull of a fish. It had evolved from the jawless and limbless type (a in Figure 10g). The primitive vertebrate skull has the main structure in the form of a braincase - a box of cartilage or replacement bone, which surrounded the brain, internal ear, nostrils, and eyes. A second element is the skeletal bars, which stiffened the gill slits. The jaws in a shark (b) were derived from the third gill bar. These are both freely movable and are quite clearly in line with the related ordinary gill bars behind them. In the |
Figure 10g Skull Formation |
bony fish (c), the dermal armour (skin bones) were added to cover the top and sides of the head completely, have fused with the original upper jaws, and the braincase, and have united them into a solid structure - a true skull. |
![]() |
differentiated. There was some early variation, but in the ancestors of the higher mammals the dentition came to be made up of three sharp nipping teeth, or incisors, at the front of each half of each jaw, a single large, stout, piercing tusk, the canine, four premolar teeth behind this in the front of the cheek region, and three grinders, the molars (see Figure 10h). This gives a total of 44 teeth. Most mammals have lost some of this set of teeth (human has 32); few have exceeded this number. This type of dentition is one |
Figure 10h Mammalian Teeth |
suitable for a carnivore, and the ancestry of all the mammals lies through a long line of flesh-eating types. |
![]() |
|
Figure 10i Ear Evolution |
the small pocket termed the lagena. In human this has expanded into the coiled cochlea. In the shark a duct from the ear (end) still connects with the surface; in human the connection is lost, and the duct ends blindly. |
![]() |
![]() |
thumb or big toe out, 2-3-4-5-3; in mammals the middle fingers have shortened up, giving a count of 2-3-3-3-3 as shown in Figure 10k with thumb or big toe to the right. The illustrations also reveal the specialization of the proximal ankle bones in mammals, some reduction in the number of wrist and ankle bones, and the variations in the thumb and big toe. |
Figure 10j Locomotion [view large image] |
Figure 10k Evolution of Limbs [view large image] |
![]() |
![]() |
of the gene for one of the remaining pigments. Thus, mammalian colour vision distinctly limited when compared with the visual world of birds and other vertebrates especially in the near ultraviolet region of the spectrum. We cannot comprehend the sensation of colour in these animals, but a camera equipped to detect only ultraviolet light "sees" patterns invisible to us as shown in Figure 10m. |
Figure 10l Colour Vision |
Figure 10m UV Photo [view large image] |
![]() |
change that occurred about 30 to 40 million years ago, after the geologic split between the African and South American continents, and thus separated the old world primates to the new world primates. The evolutionary changes have been located at three amino acid sites following the duplication. The mutations are retained because they appeared to have imparted a substantial advantage on the species (the old world primates) that bored them (see Figure 10n). The diagram shows those amino acid positions at 180, 277, and 285 within the opsin protein, which is bound to the light sensitive retinal. These differences are enough to shift the maximal light absorption from 560 nm for the red opsin to 530 nm for the green opsin. |
Figure 10n Opsin Protein |
![]() |
All the special features in mammals (Figure 10o) can be summarized into one word - "activity". The ancestors of the mammals were carnivores, leading lives in which speedy locomotion was a necessity. The limb development has given effectiveness to this kind of activity. Brain growth has given it intelligent direction. The maintenance of a high body temperature and the various changes associated with this are related to the need of a continuous supply of energy in animals leading a constantly active life. Even the improvements in reproductive habits, which are a prominent feature of mammalian development, seem related to the needs for a slow maturation of the complex mechanisms (particularly the brain) upon which the successful pursuit of an alert and active life depends. |
Figure 10o Mammals [view large image] |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Figure 11 Mammal Evolution |
Figure 12 Diversification |
is thought of as ancestral to the living monotremes (such as the platypus who lay eggs, and marsupials who nurtured the young in a pouch; see Figure 11 for the evolutionary history of the mammals). While |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Figure 13 Oldest Hominid [view |
Figure 14 Hominids in Africa [view large image] |
![]() |
![]() |
Figure 15 shows the family tree of the hominids. The 4.2 million years old Australopithecus anamensis is the descendant of Sahelanthropus tchadensis. It looks similar to the 3.5 million year old A. afarensis, a small-brained, big-faced bipedal species to which the famous "Lucy" belonged. Lucy and her kind were upright walkers but retained many ape-like characteristics. They probably represent the transition from tree dwelling to bipedal walking in the savannas as East Africa dried up. Figure 16 shows the Homo lineage starting from about two million |
Figure 15 Family Tree |
Figure 16 Human Evolution |
years ago. The use of tool and fire started about the same time. The first exodus of hominids from Africa soon followed. There were at least four waves of emigration |
![]() |
|
Figure 17 Quaternary Period [view large image] |
![]() |
![]() |
humans, who emigrated from Africa about 60000 years ago, may have slaughtered the Neanderthals. Eventually, around 35000 years ago only one species, Homo sapiens sapiens, was left. We thus find ourselves alone and yet the most numerous and successful primates in history. Such success may be at the expense of the natural environment. All the giant animals disappeared around this time. Since this was not associated with any obvious climatic change, we must therefore suspect that human may very possibly have played a large part in these extinctions2. The earth's mammal faunas have been even more reduced during the last hundred years, until many of the herbivores that once roamed North America and Africa in their thousands are nearly extinct or can be seen only in protected game parks. |
Figure 18 Neanderthals |
Figure 19 Homo Sapiens [view large image] |
![]() |
on climate, altitude, soils and the presence of other species. At present, the number of species estimated to have gone extinct as a result of human activities is still far smaller than are observed during the major mass extinctions of the geological past. However, it has been argued that the present rate of extinction is sufficient to create a major mass extinction in less than 100 years. Others dispute this and suggest that the present rate of extinctions could be sustained for many thousands of years before the loss of biodiversity matches the more than 20% losses seen in past global extinction events. |
Figure 20 Diversity of species [view large image] |