« FRANCE'S PRESIDENTIAL RACE: JOSE BOVE COMPLICATES THE CONTEST (Updated) | Main
February 03, 2007
ISLAMIC CREATIONISM INVADES FRANCE (Updated)
An article in yesterday's edition of Le Figaro, the conservative French daily, brings news
that a new book written from an Islamic Creationist perspective, ""L'Atlas de la Création" (cover, right) is making waves in France. According to the newspaper, dozens of thousands of free copies of this diatribe against Darwinism were sent from Turkey and Germany to nearly all French schools and universities. The article does not say who paid for this expensive, lavishly-illustrated, 770-page anti-intellectual propaganda tome to be so massively distributed (although it asks the question.). Nor how whomever sent it was able to get a list of the "dozens of thousands" in educational establishments to whom it was individually addressed.
The French Education Ministry reacted by advising all educational establishments that the book does not conform to the national science-based curriculum and "should not be included in the centers of documentation and information in scholarly establishments," and commissioned a dissection and refutation of the book.
The book's pseudonymous author, a Turk named Harun Yahya ( photo left -- real name: Adnan Oktar), makes a number of astonishing claims -- including that Charles Darwin is "the real source of terrorism." For example, a photo of the 9/11 attacks on the Twin Towers carries a caption reading, "Those who perpetuate terror in the world are in reality the Darwinists. Darwinism is the only philosophy which validates and encourages conflict." Yahya also pretends to portray "the secret links between Darwinism and the bloody ideologies of fascism and communism."
I was curious about the author, and a Google search rapidly revealed that Yahya -- who says he is 50 and the author of dozens of books, and that his pseudonym was "formed from the names 'Harun' and 'Yahya' in the esteemed memory of the two Prophets who struggled against infidelity" -- maintains an expensively-designed, multi-media English-language website. On it, Yahya quotes another of his books, "The Evolution Deceit," as claiming: ""The theory of evolution is nothing but a deception imposed on us by the dominators of the world system."
An article about Yahya on Wikipedia says that he has plagiarized much of his writings from U.S. Creationist texts published here in the 1950s; that he has been in mental hospitals; and that a shadowy foundation Yahya controls -- the BAV Foundation -- has persecuted Turkish university professors who dared to teach evolution (including a number of them who won a lawsuit against him.)
One can also find on Yahya's website another of his hobby-horses: he denounces what he sees as the dark, deleterious, conspiratorial effects of Freemasonry worldwide. In a book called "Global Freemasonry," summarized on his website, Yahya claims that, "Freemasons have played an important role in Europe's alienation from religion, and in its place, the founding of a new order based on the philosophies of materialism and secular humanism. We will also see how Masonry has been influential in the imposition of these dogmas to non-Western civilizations...[how] Masonry has been used to help establish and perpetuate a social order based on these dogmas. Their philosophy and the methods they use to establish this philosophy will be exposed and criticized." Mad conspiracy theories about the Freemasons abound in the Western world -- usually as part and parcel of a dangerous reactionary politics -- and have for centuries, but they also exist in the Islamic world: in 2004, as the BBC reported, a Turkish Masonic lodge in Istanbul was bombed, with 1 dead and 6 seriously injured.
Another of Yahya's books is called, "Judaism and Freemasonry" -- and yet another is entitled "The Holocaust Hoax," a book which has led scholars to categorize Yahya as a Holocaust denier.
Contrary to the fundamentalist Christian Creationists in the U.S. who have been attacking the teaching of Darwin's theory of evolution in local school boards and many state legislatures, and demanding with an alarming degree of success that Creationism be taught in the public schools, Yahya's Qur'an-based attack on Darwinism does not claim that the world and those who inhabit it were created only 6,000 years ago. Instead, Yahya admits that Earth is really 4.6 billion years old, but his "Atlas" uses hundreds of photos of fossils found over several centuries to "prove" that "the species have never changed" [sic]. This pseudo-scientific clap-trap, says noted French biologist Hervé Le Guyeder, makes this "new form of creationism even more insidious than the Christian-inspired one wreaking havoc in North America."
The photos in Yahya's "Atlas" show hundreds of fossils of fish, hyenas, ants, starfish, tree-leaves, and so on that are dozens of millions of years old, and which he then compares to photos of their actual descendants to prove his claim that "living things did not undergo a process of evolution, but were really created" [sic]. Biologist Le Guyeder commented that, "This method of argument may quite well be effective in seducing a public that is ill-informed--but the reality is that these species, which are a priori similar, are in fact very different from each other in their anatomy and genetic composition, and most of them would be incapable of reproducing between each other!"
If the millions of French ghetto youth of Muslim origin (and, for that matter, Muslim youth throughout the world) buy into Yahya's Islamic version of Creationism, the effects would be disastrous. These young people would be locked out of, and skeptical about, many of the advances in medical and scientific research in the two centuries since Darwin first articulated the theory of evolution (including the dangers of global warming, which U.S. Creationists deny exists) -- and the concomitants of such Creationist obscurantism are, as we have also seen here in the U.S with the Christian version., misogyny, homophobia, and other primitive prejudices.
For example, in a very useful essay on the website of the National Center for Science Education entitled "Cloning Creationism in Turkey," which contains an analysis of Yahya's writing, Dr. Taner Edis of Truman State University in Missouri notes, "When, in another echo of Christian creationists, Harun Yahya digresses to denounce evolution because it describes homosexuality as natural, therefore 'seeking to legitimize perversion' (Yahya 1997: 307), this might seem bizarrely out of place in an argument that is ostensibly about biology. From a fundamentalist perspective, however, it makes perfect sense — worries about morality and social decay are intimately connected to the fundamentalist view of biology. "
Edis also points out the strong ties betweeen the foundation Yahya controls -- Bilim Arastirma Vakfi (BAV; the Science Research Foundation) -- and the well-funded Institute of Creation Research (ICR), the flagship Creationist institution in the U.S. In April and July 1998, Yahya's BAV held 3 "international conferences" in the major cities of Turkey, with a theme of "The Collapse of the Theory of Evolution: The Fact of Creation" -- and these conferences featured U.S. Creationist notables from the ICR like John D. Morris (son of ICR's founder Henry Morris, whose works Yahya lifts from wholesale) and Duane Gish. (At its founding in 1970, ICR was initially funded by Rev. Tim LaHaye, a major Christian Right fundamentalist leader, through LaHaye's Christian Heritage College.)
Yahya's website, by the way, links to a number of Christian fundamentalist-run Creationist websites here in the U..S., including the ICR.
What's even scarier is that Yahya's website claims that, "Many works of Harun Yahya are being currently translated into English, French, German, Italian, Russian, Spanish, Arabic, Portuguese, Albanian, Serbo-Croat (Bosnian), Polish, Urdu, Indonesian, Kazakh, Azeri, Malay and Malayalam. The target is to translate all books into English and many other languages in the near future..." One would dearly love to know who is forking over the considerable sums of money necessary for this global publication program (some suspect Yahya is getting money from U.S. Creationists); whether other countries with large Muslim populations will be targeted for an Islamic Creationist propaganda blitz as France has been; and to what degree Yahya's theories have gained a serious foothold outside Turkey in Islamic circles world-wide, especially among the young. And one can only pity those who are gullible enough to buy this illuminé's fantasies.
MORE ON YAHYA: After the above was posted, Scott Long of Human Rights Watch (he's the Director of HRW's Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Rights Program), e-mailed the Euroqueer listserv -- where my post on Yahya was circulated -- to provide some additional information. Long wrote: "Harun Yahya may be new to the French, but he is a familiar face in Turkey. My Turkish colleagues can correct me, but my understanding is that he emerged in the 1980s, when the secular, right-wing, military-backed Evren-Ozal regime was trying to reach out to disaffected religious elements. The regime almost certainly funded him then, and he and his BAV (Science Research Foundation) continue to profit from close ties across the right wing of Turkish politics--the Islamist party in its successive incarnations, but also other political forces. (Unusually for a Turkish Islamist, he's spoken with particular respect of Ataturk.) The question of who's paying for him probably does not have, or need, a sinister Saudi answer. He gets resources from his murky connections in Turkish politics, where he's rumored to be a blackmailer and enforcer. He also gets heavy support from US Christian evangelicals, who are barred by law from proselytizing in Turkey and see supporting creationism as a way in through the back door. Several leading US creationists came to Istanbul for a conference on creationism in the early 90s, and the ties have been maintained." And, Long added, Yahya is "a nasty fellow."
Also, my confrere Bill Berkowitz -- one of the best journalists covering the U.S. right -- has now e-mailed me to say that the Darwin-caused-Hitler theory espoused by Yahya is another of his points in common with our homegrown Creationists -- last September, Bill wrote a piece for Media Transparency on a documentary touting this theory that was produced by Rev. D. James Kennedy's powerful Coral Ridge Ministries (also a fundamentalist fount of homophobia) -- the documentary's promo proclaimed, "The program features 14 scholars, scientists and authors who outline the grim consequences of Darwin's theory of evolution and show how his theory fueled Hitler's ovens." What madness......
Posted by Doug Ireland at 05:35 AM | Permalink
Comments
I noticed a reference to some of my work on Islamic creationism (always a good way to make an academic happy). Anyone interested in more about Islamic creationism and about the current uneasy relationship between Islam and science might want to look at my book An Illusion of Harmony: Science and Religion in Islam. It should come out in a few weeks.
Posted by: Taner Edis | Feb 6, 2007 2:09:37 PM
No professional Darwinist would claim that the fossil record is “incomplete” and still there is hope that in future intermediate forms would be found.
Famous paleontologist T. Neville George admits that fact: There is no need to apologize any longer for the poverty of the fossil record. In some ways it has become almost unmanageably rich and discovery is outpacing integration… The fossil record nevertheless continues to be composed mainly of gaps.” (Fossils in Evolutionary Perspective, Science Progress, vol. 48, January 1960, pp. 1, 3.)
Another prominent Darwinist figure S.J. Gould tells that: ”
The history of most fossil species include two features particularly
inconsistent with gradualism:
1) STASIS; most species exhibit no directional change during their
tenure on earth. They appear in the fossil record looking much the
same as when they disappear; morphological change is usually
limited and directionless;
2) SUDDEN APPEARANCE; in any local area, a species does not arise
gradually by the steady transformation of its ancestors; it appears
all at once and ‘fully formed’.
(S.J. Gould, “Evolution’s Erratic Pace”, Natural History, vol. 86, May 1977.)
There is lot more to say on the completeness of the fossil record and the absence of any evidence for evolution. You better get correct and detailed information here: http://www.harunyahya.com/books/darwinism/atlas_creation/atlas_creation_01.php
Posted by: Dr Jon Guildiara | Feb 5, 2007 5:30:45 PM
No professional Darwinist would claim that the fossil record is “incomplete” and still there is hope that in future intermediate forms would be found.
Famous paleontologist T. Neville George admits that fact: There is no need to apologize any longer for the poverty of the fossil record. In some ways it has become almost unmanageably rich and discovery is outpacing integration… The fossil record nevertheless continues to be composed mainly of gaps.” (Fossils in Evolutionary Perspective, Science Progress, vol. 48, January 1960, pp. 1, 3.)
Another prominent Darwinist figure S.J. Gould tells that: ”
The history of most fossil species include two features particularly
inconsistent with gradualism:
1) STASIS; most species exhibit no directional change during their
tenure on earth. They appear in the fossil record looking much the
same as when they disappear; morphological change is usually
limited and directionless;
2) SUDDEN APPEARANCE; in any local area, a species does not arise
gradually by the steady transformation of its ancestors; it appears
all at once and ‘fully formed’.
(S.J. Gould, “Evolution’s Erratic Pace”, Natural History, vol. 86, May 1977.)
There is lot more to say on the completeness of the fossil record and the absence of any evidence for evolution. You better get correct and detailed information here: http://www.harunyahya.com/books/darwinism/atlas_creation/atlas_creation_01.php
Posted by: Dr Jon Guildiara | Feb 5, 2007 5:28:29 PM
No professional Darwinist would claim that the fossil record is “incomplete” and still there is hope that in future intermediate forms would be found.
Famous paleontologist T. Neville George admits that fact: There is no need to apologize any longer for the poverty of the fossil record. In some ways it has become almost unmanageably rich and discovery is outpacing integration… The fossil record nevertheless continues to be composed mainly of gaps.” (Fossils in Evolutionary Perspective, Science Progress, vol. 48, January 1960, pp. 1, 3.)
Another prominent Darwinist figure S.J. Gould tells that: ”
The history of most fossil species include two features particularly
inconsistent with gradualism:
1) STASIS; most species exhibit no directional change during their
tenure on earth. They appear in the fossil record looking much the
same as when they disappear; morphological change is usually
limited and directionless;
2) SUDDEN APPEARANCE; in any local area, a species does not arise
gradually by the steady transformation of its ancestors; it appears
all at once and ‘fully formed’.
(S.J. Gould, “Evolution’s Erratic Pace”, Natural History, vol. 86, May 1977.)
There is lot more to say on the completeness of the fossil record and the absence of any evidence for evolution. You better get correct and detailed information here: http://www.harunyahya.com/books/darwinism/atlas_creation/atlas_creation_01.php
Posted by: Dr Jon Guildiara | Feb 5, 2007 5:27:52 PM
It should be noted that the evidence of evolution is increasing. This is something that creationists ignore. In fact, creationists have been in retreat for the last century. The scopes trial was about allowing schools to teach evolution. Now, just getting equal time for creationis and Intelligent Design has proved a near impossible goal in most industrialized nations. In the global scientific community, creationists can't even get their foot in the door.
Posted by: George Arndt | Feb 5, 2007 3:15:33 PM
Wait a minute I know this guy! He spoke at my College less tha a month ago! I go to Elgin Community College and he spoke there about this creationism BS. It was set up by the Muslim Student Club here. I actually sat through a little bit of it then left. I can't stand hearing christians talking about it when this was saying it was just as intolerable. To top it all off a biology teacher is going to publish her rebutle in the college paper.
Posted by: frankwolftown | Feb 5, 2007 1:10:55 PM
Zach,
The connection between Creationists and Global Warming skeptics is deeper than merely "a general distrust of the scientific establishment and a general antipathy for environmentalists/big government types." It has to do with their fundamental misunderstanding and politicization of science.
Science is a slow process characterized by challenges to authority, redundancy in experimentation and the rigorous adherence to a method of inquiry. Those who don't understand this--or who choose to ignore it when their ox is being gored--are always susceptible to the notion that when a handful of "professionals" disagree, there must be a legitimate controversy. There is no legitimate controversy regarding evolution (or man-made global warming) among scientists, but there is a lot of sophistry.
Scientists, however, are not sophists. The power of their arguments are not contained in the elegance of their speeches or in their ability to persuade. The power of their arguments rests entirely on their meticulous adherence to the scientific method and the culture of skeptical peer review that dominates their discipline. These are entirely foreign concepts to the Creationists and anti-environmentalists. Eugenics may have been a project of "scientists," but it was also diwsmantled and shown false by scientists--that's how science works. There is little chance of the same thing occurring among Creationists.
Posted by: Decline and Fall | Feb 5, 2007 11:00:15 AM
Though I of course disagree with Yahya, I would point out that the eugenicists of the 1930s saw themselves as the direct heirs of Darwin and his theories. And of course, eugenics formed the basis of Nazi racist policies, such as forces sterilization of undesirables such as homosexuals, the mentally-challenged, etc. It isn't a far stretch from "survival of the fittest" to race war. In fact, survival of the fittest includes competition between groups as well as among individuals.
And, though I don't doubt that most American creationists are global warming sceptics, I think that this doesn't have anything to do with a logical connection, but with a general distrust of the scientific establishment and a general antipathy for environmentalists/big government types.
Posted by: Zach | Feb 5, 2007 3:53:36 AM
Protagonist--there have been similar revolutions in evolutionary biology, from the development of understanding of genetics to molecular biology to evo-devo. Read Carl Zimmer's excellent book Evolution: The Triumph of an Idea in its revised edition, which points out many new discoveries have been found just within the last decade, such as finding genes that specifically relate to mental function, such as FOXP2 and its relation to language function.
The evidence for evolution has been growing by leaps and bounds.
Posted by: Jim Lippard | Feb 4, 2007 7:06:40 PM
"But I will say that the theory of evolution, as it now stands, is relatively unchanged since the mid-1800s, is full of anomalies which can't be adequately explained away, and is untestable as a scientific theory."
This is a profoundly ignorant statement. The "theory of evolution" has undergone enormous changes, the biggest being the discovery that DNA is responsible for heredity and that acquired characteristics are not inherited.
This is a common canard of those who would deny evolution, that it's all dogma laid down by Darwin. Nothing could be further from the truth. Darwin was wrong about a lot of things, but he was not wrong when he said there was such a thing as evolution by natural selection. He was profoundly wrong about heredity. Well, Isaac Newton was wrong about light. So what?
There have been any number of debates and controversies and paradigm shifts in evolutionary biology--"punctuated equilibria" and "selfish genes" and whatnot--those being ones that were going on in my lifetime, that I was aware of, even though my field is physics.
You could only say that "evolution hasn't changed since the 1800's" if you knew nothing whatever about it.
Posted by: Gabriel Hanna | Feb 4, 2007 6:52:18 PM
But I will say that the theory of evolution, as it now stands, is relatively unchanged since the mid-1800s, is full of anomalies which can't be adequately explained away, and is untestable as a scientific theory.
This is a profoundly ignorant statement. The "theory of evolution" has undergone enormous changes, the biggest being the discovery that DNA is responsible for heredity and that acquired characteristics are not inherited.
This is a common canard of those who would deny evolution, that it's all dogma laid down by Darwin. Nothing could be further from the truth. Darwin was wrong about a lot of things, but he was not wrong when he said there was such a thing as evolution by natural selection. He was profoundly wrong about heredity. Well, Isaac Newton was wrong about light. So what?
There have been any number of debates and controversies and paradigm shifts in evolutionary biology--"punctuated equilibria" and "selfish genes" and whatnot--those being ones that were going on in my lifetime, that I was aware of, even though my field is physics.
You could only say that "evolution hasn't changed since the 1800's" if you knew nothing whatever about it.
Posted by: Gabriel Hanna | Feb 4, 2007 6:51:04 PM
" ... Yahya also pretends to portray "the secret links between Darwinism and the bloody ideologies of fascism and communism." "
While I have no idea what the particulars are of what this guy "portrays" viz-a-viz the "links" ... like it or not there IS a strong link between fascism, at least as practiced by the Nazis in the 1930's & 40's, and Darwinism. That of course has nothing to do with the science of Darwinism, but to imply that there is no real connection (I got that impression myself by your use of the word "pretends") is ludicrous.
Posted by: LDCA | Feb 4, 2007 6:27:55 PM
You, and those you quote, seem to have a huge interest in having everyone view evolution your way. Why is that? Evangelical creationists have the excuse that they're trying to get their point of view across in other to get everyone into heaven. What's you angle? Why don't you leave people alone you don't see things your way and who aren't harming you.
I'm raising this point from the other side of the fence. I use to be sympathetic to D. James Kennedy's side, but have since grown neutral in the "creationism" debate. In my opinion, there's enough empirical evidence to confirm a faith in Christianity without having to dwell on Genesis 1-11. There is at least one correct interpretation of Genesis. I don't care if evolutionists or creationists/IDers are right; it has nothing to do with my relationship with God.
But I will say that the theory of evolution, as it now stands, is relatively unchanged since the mid-1800s, is full of anomalies which can't be adequately explained away, and is untestable as a scientific theory.
Compare evolution with physics. In the past century, physics have undergone huge shift after shift in its basic theory, from (1) Newtonian classical physics, (2) to Einstein's special and general relativity, (3) to quantum physics, (4) to 5 different superstring theories, (5) to M-Theory, (6) to other possible alternatives or add-ons, e.g. holography principle. At each stage, theories were criticized and overturned, and the physicists advocating the theories admitted the possibility that their calculations were incomplete or outright wrong. The current proponents of String Theory/M-Theory are currently very concerned that their theories can't be experimently proved and are open to the possiblity that their theories belongs in the realm of mathematics or philosophy.
This isn't the case with evolution. Creation and ID advocates have been critical for decades that evolution can't explain the formation of (extremely complicated) single-cell organisms, complex anatomical and neural structures, can't find enough "missing links", or explain the emergence of consciousness. In turn, they're turned away as crackpots, mystics and religious nuts.
Evolutionist need to face the possibility that they are wrong. Or at the very least, they need to respond to anomalies in their theory and allow for public disagreement by those who don't think evolutionists have proved their theory beyond a reasonable doubt.
Posted by: Protagonist | Feb 4, 2007 5:03:20 PM
There's a Harun Yahya video up on YouTube. As you would expect, it's full of BS.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=slJ1ZINQBfY
Posted by: BC | Feb 4, 2007 3:18:33 PM
The "right wing" secular Turkish parties and the "right wing" Islamist parties are in fact the opposite ends of the political spectrum in Turkey.
Posted by: PJ | Feb 4, 2007 2:37:47 PM
A Geologist Looks At Global Warming:
http://powerandcontrol.blogspot.com/2006/12/geologist-looks-at-global-warming.html
CO2 and global temperatures are low by geologic standards (even if you only consider the last 100 million years).
Oh yeah. Could some one give me a range of acceptable global temperatures? What should the global thermostat be set at? What should we do about the 12/22 year solar cycle and variations in the Earths orbit and wobble? Should ice ages be allowed? How about if it gets as warm as it was 10 million years ago?
There is global warming on Mars. How is that explained by SUVs on earth?
BTW Darwin got it right. As DNA shows.
Posted by: M. Simon | Feb 4, 2007 1:59:32 PM
"(including the dangers of global warming, which U.S. Creationists deny exists) -- and the concomitants of such Creationist obscurantism are, as we have also seen here in the U.S with the Christian version., misogyny, homophobia, and other primitive prejudices."
Interesting post, but I couldn't object more strongly to your characterizing Christians who understand God created the world as is described in the Bible as global warming denyers, woman haters, gay-fearers, and otherwise prejudice. Feel free to make your case on Yahya based on what he has said and written, but there's no need to bash "ad hominen" a whole class of Americans in doing so.
Posted by: Don | Feb 4, 2007 1:42:11 PM
Darwin help us if these irrational ideas prevail
Posted by: goomp | Feb 4, 2007 1:05:49 PM
Where do you think he got the "99% of all fossils have been found" nonsense? Heck, we estimate that we've only discovered a fraction of the number of CURRENTLY LIVING species, let alone fossil species.
The idea that transitional forms cannot be their own species, as his website claims, also has to be about one of the funniest stupid things I've ever heard anyone say about evolution.
Posted by: plunge | Feb 3, 2007 8:50:06 PM